Debate Praise for Romney as Obama Is Faulted as Flat - New York Times [dayinformations.blogspot.com]
Question by MVP: What's this new "Facebook Timeline" and why is it such a big privacy issue? I've heard this new change facebook will be doing to your profile will effect your privacy settings? Please tell me how and what this exactly this "timeline" is. Best answer for What's this new "Facebook Timeline" and why is it such a big privacy issue?:
Answer by Anna
It defaults to show the public all of your pictures, statuses, etc. but you can fix it, so i've heard. But you gotta do it like right after you get the timeline Personally, I don't like it.
Answer by abraXus
it's just a different look for your profile that categorized everything you have done on facebook chronologically, making it easier to see things that lots of people apparently didnt realize where still part of their profile from years ago it doesnt change any of your privacy settings at all when you convert, in fact, the timeline adds additional privacy controls the regular profiles didnt have - but the people who dont like the timeline just dont seem to realize that yet - they see something new and automatically hate it because they have to relearn it again and no, it doesnt suddenly make everything you have public if it wasnt set to public already... despite what anyone says... those thoughts are coming from the people who didnt realize that all those old status's were all permanently saved in their account
Answer by Fukyou
instead of having pictures all bunched up in folders, you have a literal timeline. this makes privacy harder because if a person returns to your page and sorts through the pictures too many time it sends you a stalker alert (no seriously) but now they dont have to sift thought the thousands of pictures, he can just choose a date and find it on the timeline no problem
Answer by Richard James
If you really want to know you should read these articles that explain it very well: How to proect Timeline privacy. http://howto.cnet.com/8301-11310_39-20112978-285/how-to-protect-your-facebook-timeline-privacy/ and Facebook Timeline a 'stalker's paradise' http://www.zdnet.com/blog/igeneration/facebook-timeline-a-stalkers-paradise-mass-exodus-on-the-way/12931
The Morning Of- The New is InTrack 6 on The World as we know it. Lyrics: It feels like a lover, I won't see in the morning. So I keep my eyes open through the night. I take these things for more than what they're worth. Call me a hopless romantic, call me just plain pathetic, I am what I feel, and tonight I don't feel that much. The new is in, the new is in. I'm feeling better all ready. I shed my skin, I shed my skin. My head is starting to steady. I'm sorry I won't be reachable for days, I'm cutting myself off. Please leave me be in my misery, I'm making ammends with my concious. So, come next year I won't be reachable for days, Because I'm taking time to let this story write it's page. I'm now convinced that there will be no other way. Break apart the boy I used to be, And build the man that I've become. I am a saint in sinners clothing, Watch me save the world. I am a saint in sinners skin, Now let the healing begin. Let the healing begin. I can look myself in the eye now, I can feel some magic happening. I can breathe on my own now, I can feel my body sinking in. Sinking in, sinking in
By Jon Shure. Fifteen years. Has it really been that long? When I started New Jersey Policy Perspective in 1997, I couldn't be sure it would last one year, let alone 15. I never doubted the need. As blue a state as New Jersey might be, debate on how to ... Opinion: New Jersey Policy Perspective has played crucial role in public affairs
The immediate reaction to Wednesday nightâs presidential debate was a torrent of criticism directed at President Obama, with Republicans, and as well as many Democrats, accusing Mr. Obama of delivering a flat, uninspired and defensive performance.
Republicans seemed genuinely surprised that his opponent, Mitt Romney, was energetic, aggressive and presidential during his first-ever general election debate.
âIn a thoroughly dominating performance, Romney bested Barack Obama in both tone and substance,â Stephen F. Hayes of the conservative Weekly Standard magazine wrote after the debate. âObama often found himself at the end of a verbal cul-de-sac, seemingly unaware of how heâd ended up there.â
On Twitter, some of Mr. Obamaâs Democratic allies expressed anger and disappointment that the president did not make better use of the â47 percentâ speech by Mr. Romney and other missteps that the Democratic campaign has spent months honing into attack ads and stump speeches.
Andrew Sullivan, a liberal blogger and staunch supporter of Mr. Obama, wrote on Twitter that âthis is a rolling calamity for Obama. Heâs boring, abstract, and less human-seeming than Romney!â
And Bill Maher, the liberal comedian who had donated $ 1 million to a âsuperPACâ backing Mr. Obama, joked: âI canât believe Iâm saying this, but Obama looks like he DOES need a teleprompter.â
At this point, it remains unclear whether these snap assessments and others made immediately after the debate will be matched by the more sober judgments of voters in the upcoming days. Voters sometimes surprise the pundits by coming to different conclusions about the outcome of a presidential debate.
And Mr. Obamaâs top strategists predicted that some of Mr. Romneyâs answers â" in particular, his admissions about the need for a voucher system for Medicare â" would deepen the concern in some communities about Mr. Romneyâs policies.
âHe was unable and unwilling to explain the math behind his $ 5 trillion tax cut favoring the wealthy, refused to say what rules heâd put in place to protect consumers after repealing Wall Street reform, and didnât offer a single idea to protect families from insurance company abuses after repealing Obamacare,â Jim Messina, Mr. Obamaâs campaign manager, said in a statement after the debate.
The candidates head out to the campaign trail immediately, where Mr. Romney will have to find a way to turn the positive reviews from the debate into a sustained push that changes the dynamic of the race. He is expected to campaign with Representative Paul D. Ryan, his vice-presidential running mate, in Virginia on Thursday evening.
Mr. Obama has been very aggressive of late on the stump, and his scheduled events on Thursday in Denver and Madison, Wis., will give him a quick opportunity to show that energy. But some Democrats charged with helping to elect Mr. Obama in some key swing states privately expressed frustration after the debate Wednesday night that Mr. Obamaâs lackluster performance made their jobs harder.
The debate was designed to be wonkish, and it did not disappoint. By giving the candidates 15 minutes â" or more â" to discuss each topic, the debate provided that there were plenty of long-winding answers filled with sometimes mind-numbing statistics.
It might have made the exchange boring in the eyes of voters who have come to expect short and fast-paced political combat. There were almost no âzingersâ designed to embarrass the other candidate or create a bumper-sticker moment.
Those kinds of âgotchaâ moments have sometimes changed the course of an election, as did Gerald Fordâs inaccurate contention that there had never been any Soviet domination of Eastern Europe. Without such a moment, Wednesdayâs debate may have less impact.
But the perceived imbalance between the two performances seemed certain to provide at least a temporary bump for Mr. Romney, who had been struggling to reinvigorate a somewhat faltering campaign during the past several weeks. Ahead of the debate, Mr. Romney was trailing slightly in national polls and by larger margins in some battleground states.
Republicans, declaring Mr. Romney the clear winner of the debate, predicted his performance would help him win the election in just over a month.
Democratic strategists for Mr. Obamaâs campaign were forced to acknowledge Mr. Romneyâs aggressive performance. Stephanie Cutter, the deputy campaign manager for Mr. Obamaâs campaign, said on CNN that Mr. Romney âscores points on style.â
David Plouffe, a senior White House adviser who ran Mr. Obamaâs 2008 campaign, said that the president did not bring up some of the attacks that the campaign has made in television ads. He said the âmission tonight was not for zingers.â
Ms. Cutter insisted that Mr. Romney did not fundamentally alter the dynamics of the campaign.
âMitt Romney needed to come in here tonight, not just to win this debate, which challengers normally do, letâs face it,â Ms. Cutter said on CNN. âHe needed to change the entire dynamic of this race. He didnât. He didnât do that because he doubled down on the same policies that have dogged him for the last 18 months.â
Even Democratic pollsters said that focus groups they convened during the debate were impressed by Mr. Romney and somewhat surprised by Mr. Obamaâs lack of an aggressive performance. In a memo released Thursday morning, the Democratic polling firm of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner concluded that Mr. Romney had a good night.
âThe dial testing and follow-up discussions showed Mitt Romney performing well, improving his personal appeal and a number of important attributes,â the firm concluded. âObama also impressed the group, but not to the same degree as Romney. However, the research does not suggest that Romney fundamentally changed the political calculus in this election.â
Both campaigns quickly used the debate to try to raise money for the last month of the race.
In an e-mail sent just after 1 a.m. on the East Coast, Mr. Obama wrote to his supporters: âI hope I made you proud out there explaining the vision we share for this country. Now we need to go win this election â" the most important thing that will happen tonight is what you do (or donât do) to help in the little time we have left.â
Earlier in the evening, Mr. Ryan and Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, both sent e-mails seeking donations for Mr. Romneyâs campaign.
âAfter watching tonightâs debate, the choice this November could not be clearer,â Mr. Rubio said. âA vote for Barack Obama is a vote for four more years of economic stagnation and weak foreign policy; as well as higher taxes, debt, and health care costs.â
And by Thursday morning, the campaigns and their allies at the Democratic and Republican National Committees had both produced YouTube videos that they hoped would help spread their message about the debate online.
Mr. Obamaâs campaign released a video called âMostly Fiction,â in which it accuses Mr. Romney of playing âfast and looseâ with the truth during the debate.
âThe sharpest observers saw beyond Romneyâs âzingersâ and witnessed him looking in the eye of those he expects to elect him and tell outright lies about his record on several occasions â" at least 12 times,â the campaign said in a news release that accompanied the video.
Republicans produced one called âSmirk,â which showed Mr. Obamaâs reaction during much of the debate. In the video, the president is shown looking down with a grimace on his face, or smirking while Mr. Romney talks about the failures of Mr. Obamaâs administration.
In the Democratic video, called âWhat a Guy,â the Democratic committee shows Mr. Romney running roughshod over the moderator of the debate, Jim Lehrer, at several points.
Lords of Uberdark - Lords of Uberdark NEW FEATURES Alpha 37Alpha 37, the latest GREATEST release of Lords of Uberdark voxel building game. Here's a good 'ol change long: Buy it here: lordsofuberdark.com [*] Added directory structure [*] Added Windows icon [*] Added roots material type [*] Added first-round fluid simulation [*] Added inverse mouse option [*] Added swimming and submersion [*] Changed trees to be choppable [*] Changed fluid rendering system again (shore) [*] Changed fluid rendering system again (depth) [*] Changed pick so it damages zombies [*] Changed terrain rendering to improve distance [*] Fixed bug with material collection [*] Fixed zombi attack bug





0 comments:
Post a Comment